<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Collatz Conjecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jpcameron.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=47" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47</link>
	<description>Where I post my thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 20:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: m3kw</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>m3kw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 20:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Hint,Try subing in 0.999999 instead of one in 3n+1, use 3n+0.999999999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hint,Try subing in 0.999999 instead of one in 3n+1, use 3n+0.999999999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search For Collatz Conjecture &#124; Tech News</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Search For Collatz Conjecture &#124; Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] The Collatz Conjecture « Jeff Cameron&#039;s BlogI have been fascinated by the Collatz conjecture for years. It&#8217;s a math problem that is so simple to understand, yet no mathematician has managed to solve it. Since the problem was first proposed by Lothar Collatz in 1937, &#8230; Read more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Collatz Conjecture « Jeff Cameron&#39;s BlogI have been fascinated by the Collatz conjecture for years. It&#8217;s a math problem that is so simple to understand, yet no mathematician has managed to solve it. Since the problem was first proposed by Lothar Collatz in 1937, &#8230; Read more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Looks like Randall got in your head already: http://xkcd.com/710/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Randall got in your head already: <a href="http://xkcd.com/710/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/710/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Skinner</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>John Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-57</guid>
		<description>You have toooooooooo muuuuuuuuuch time on your hands. Go OUTSIDE! It&#039;s a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have toooooooooo muuuuuuuuuch time on your hands. Go OUTSIDE! It&#8217;s a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collatz Conjecture</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Collatz Conjecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] The Collatz Conjecture &#194;&#171; Jeff Cameron&#8217;s Blog (jpcameron.com) - February 27, 2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Collatz Conjecture &Acirc;&laquo; Jeff Cameron&#8217;s Blog (jpcameron.com) &#8211; February 27, 2010 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I made a silly experiment using the conjecture to generate music. See:

http://wiki.freaks-unidos.net/weblogs/arhuaco/listen-to-the-collatz-conjecture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a silly experiment using the conjecture to generate music. See:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.freaks-unidos.net/weblogs/arhuaco/listen-to-the-collatz-conjecture" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.freaks-unidos.net/weblogs/arhuaco/listen-to-the-collatz-conjecture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evan</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-39</guid>
		<description>interesting to see how primes are mapped on this in red.  I like the moire like effect.... intriguing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting to see how primes are mapped on this in red.  I like the moire like effect&#8230;. intriguing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-36</guid>
		<description>This is equivalent to proving that eventually a number in the sequence will be a power of two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is equivalent to proving that eventually a number in the sequence will be a power of two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Oops, I submitted too early!
And my claim isn&#039;t true either. I found a counter example. 

But they do seem to converge to prime numbers.
What&#039;s going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I submitted too early!<br />
And my claim isn&#8217;t true either. I found a counter example. </p>
<p>But they do seem to converge to prime numbers.<br />
What&#8217;s going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen</title>
		<link>http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47&#038;cpage=1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpcameron.com/blog/?p=47#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Some obversations:

1) every odd number always immediately becomes an even number
2) even numbers are repeatedly divided by two. This will always end in a PRIME number. 

Is 2) a proven fact? I&#039;m not a mathimatician!

You divide even numbers by two. If they are again an even number, you repeat this over and over again. This seems to always end in a prime number.

Is that something that is proven? It might be crucial here. Since it was proven, then all you need to prove is that it will go to 1 for all prime numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some obversations:</p>
<p>1) every odd number always immediately becomes an even number<br />
2) even numbers are repeatedly divided by two. This will always end in a PRIME number. </p>
<p>Is 2) a proven fact? I&#8217;m not a mathimatician!</p>
<p>You divide even numbers by two. If they are again an even number, you repeat this over and over again. This seems to always end in a prime number.</p>
<p>Is that something that is proven? It might be crucial here. Since it was proven, then all you need to prove is that it will go to 1 for all prime numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
